Bumper Docs
bumper.fiDiscordForum
  • Learn
    • What is Bumper?
    • Documentation Structure
    • Why Use Bumper?
      • Comparison with stop-loss
      • Comparison with options
    • BUMP Token
      • Overview
      • BUMP Token Ecosystem
        • Design Background
        • Token Utility
        • Token Network
          • Network Bond (Primary Utility)
          • Network Incentive (Primary Utility)
          • Representative Governance (Primary Utility)
          • Network Boost (Secondary Utility)
          • Staking (Secondary Utility)
        • Roadmap
        • Token Metrics
          • Token Details
          • Token Emission
        • DAO Governance
          • Current Status
          • Future Status
    • Staking
    • Guides
      • Connect a wallet
      • Hedge - Open a position
      • Hedge - Exit a position
      • Hedge - Renew a position
      • Earn - Open a position
      • Earn - Close a position
      • Earn - Renew a position
      • dApp Interface
        • Dashboard
        • Hedge Positions
        • Earn Positions
      • Risk Rating
      • How do I add my BUMP to Metamask?
      • How do I add my bUSDC token to MetaMask?
      • How to buy BUMP on Uniswap
      • Liquidity Mining
        • How to Participate In Bumper’s Liquidity Mining Program - A step-by-step guide
      • Troubleshooting
      • Use cases & strategies
      • Legacy Guides
        • How to unstake & claim rewards from legacy staking
        • Claiming vested BUMP tokens
        • Withdrawing liquidity from Bumper's legacy LP program
        • Claiming BUMP tokens for Public Sale Participants
    • Protocol Risks
      • General risks
      • Taker liquidations
      • Maker liquidations
    • Premiums and Yields
    • FAQs
    • Troubleshooting
  • Protocol
    • Overview
      • Preliminaries
      • User Positions
    • Premium
      • Price Risk Factor (PRF)
      • Liability Risk Factor (VRF)
      • Probability of Claim
      • Liquidity Risk Factor (LRF)
      • Computing the Premium and Updating State
      • Visual Representation of Premium
    • Rebalancing
      • Cross-Side Rebalance and Swap Deadband
      • Asset and Capital Ledger
      • Rebalancing Trade Grid
      • Computing Swap Amounts
      • Same-Side Rebalancing
    • Taker Lifecycle
      • Taker Optionality
      • Taker Share
      • Taker Fungibility
      • Taker Position Token
      • Taker Risk Rates
      • Taker Renewal
      • Taker Close and Claim
      • Taker Position Expiry
      • Taker Ejection
      • Taker Cancellation
    • Maker Lifecycle
      • Maker Optionality
      • Maker Share
      • Maker Fungibility
      • Maker Position Token
      • Maker Risk Rates
      • Maker Withdrawal
      • Maker Renewal
      • Negative Yields
    • Simulation
    • Glossary
  • Governance
    • Overview
    • DAO Overview & Structure
      • Purpose of the DAO
      • Committees
      • Forum
      • Quorums
    • Economic Settings
      • Parameter tuning
      • Community involvement
    • Voting Power
      • vBUMP
      • Staking & Locking
    • Bumper Improvement Proposals (BIPs)
      • Before a proposal is created
      • Raising a proposal
      • Committee review
      • Warmup Period
      • Voting period
      • Grace & Queue periods
      • Abrogation
    • DAO user guides
      • How to Stake tokens in the Bumper DAO
      • How to Unstake tokens in the Bumper DAO
      • How to Claim Staking Rewards in the Bumper DAO
      • How to Lock tokens in the Bumper DAO
      • Delegating vBUMP
      • How to Undelegate vBUMP in the Bumper DAO
      • Voting on a governance proposal
      • Cancelling a vote
      • Voting on an Abrogation Proposal
      • Creating a Proposal in the DAO
      • Execute a proposal in the Bumper DAO
    • DAO Legal
  • Developers
    • Architecture
    • Modules
    • Contract Address List
  • Community
    • Community Code of Conduct
    • Alpha
      • Feedback and Support
      • Reporting Bugs
      • Connecting to Bumper network
  • Security
    • Audits
  • Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Protocol
  2. Premium

Liability Risk Factor (VRF)

PreviousPrice Risk Factor (PRF)NextProbability of Claim

Last updated 1 year ago

We then develop an understanding of the protocol’s liabilities.

For v1.0 in particular, we measure the protocol’s capital liability resulting from Taker Claims.

We do this by:

  1. Computing the average floor price weighted by the position size of Takers as a fraction of the current ETH price, and,

  2. Computing the weighted average time to maturity of all Taker positions.

We consider the weighted average time to maturity, the procedure to compute the VRF would assume all Liabilities are "current". This actually may be desirable to some extent such that it may under-damp the protocol’s premium response to the liquidity risk signal, providing agent incentives the necessary time to have effect on the protocol ahead of using secondary measures such as selling assets via keeper trades.

Thus we define two Liability Risk Vectors Each element k of the liability vector v_(k, t) is calculated based on the ratio between some reference (r_(v, k, t)) and its measure (alpha_(v, k, t)). The larger the ratio the higher the risk, e.g., the larger the ratio between the Taker Asset-Weighted Average Floor (TWAF) and the ETH price, the higher is the risk. For standardisation purposes we transform those values such that they are bounded between 1 and 4.

The first ratio:

reflects the relative proximity of the protocol’s weighted average floor price to the currently measured asset price e.g. ETH/USD rate. We use the weighted price floor here to account for the economic risk to the protocol relating to the distribution of Taker floors. For example, a state where the ratio is superior to 1 i.e. the TWAF is significantly greater than the current ETH price, this implies that the average Taker position is deeply in the money. Conversely, if ETH price is higher than the global protocol floor price, the risk of positions being in the money is lower and the ratio is inferior to 1.0.

The second ratio, Taker’s Weighted Average Time-to-Maturity, is a measure of a benchmark relative to the average time to maturity weighted by the position size (based on assets deposited on open, not the remainder after premium is paid).

We use the weighted average term to account for economic risk of the protocol relating to the distribution of Taker positions’ maturities, e.g. a protocol heavily weighted towards shorter maturities is riskier than that skewed with longer maturities.

Then, using the following formulation:

Such that: